Document: TRANSMITTAL LETTER COPY FILED
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//614.0 TRANSMITTAL LETTER COPY FILED 2024-08-13 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-08-13
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document provided appears to be a transmittal letter related to a custody case involving the father, Aaron Surina, and his two sons, A.A.S. and D.M.S. From the father’s perspective, there are several potential instances of unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices evident in this document and the underlying case:
1. Denial of Statutory Relief: The transmittal letter indicates that the case has been filed with the Court of Appeals Division III, suggesting that the father may have sought relief from a lower court and had his requests denied. This could indicate a potential denial of statutory relief, where the father’s legal rights under relevant statutes may not have been upheld.
2. Violation of Constitutional Rights: The involvement of the appellate court and the mention of a custody case suggest that there may have been violations of the father’s constitutional rights, particularly regarding his rights as a parent to custody and visitation with his children. Any infringements on these rights would be a serious injustice.
3. Ignored Violence Against Children: If there were allegations of violence or harm against the children that were ignored or not adequately addressed by the court, this would be a clear example of judicial bias and unethical conduct. The court has a duty to protect the well-being of children in custody cases.
4. Damages and Losses: The mention of “Clerks Papers” and “Supplemental” files in the transmittal letter could indicate that there has been a significant amount of documentation and legal proceedings in this case. If the father and his sons have sustained damages, whether financial or emotional, as a result of the court’s actions or inactions, this would further highlight the injustices they have faced.
5. False Pretenses and Abuse of the Civil Court: If the father believes that the opposing party, possibly Sirinya Surina, has used false pretenses or abused the civil court system to gain an unfair advantage or harm the father’s case, this would be a serious ethical violation. The court has a duty to ensure that all parties act in good faith and in accordance with the law.
In summary, the transmittal letter and the context of the custody case suggest that the father, Aaron Surina, and his two sons have faced significant challenges and potential injustices in their legal proceedings. From the father’s perspective, there are indications of unethical conduct, judicial bias, and violations of rights that have impacted their ability to seek relief and protect the well-being of the children involved.
About The Author
