Document: MOTION
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//621.0 MOTION 2024-08-27 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-08-27
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document titled “MOTION” reflects the father, Aaron Surina’s, perspective on unethical conduct and judicial bias in a custody dispute case, particularly concerning critical video evidence. Aaron is seeking to admit the video evidence while halting further action until it is properly preserved with a valid chain of custody. The document highlights that the video evidence was altered without proper preservation by opposing counsel, Mr. Stanley Kempner Jr., significantly impacting its clarity and evidentiary value. It stresses the legal standards requiring evidence to be preserved in its original form and obtained through a valid chain of custody to ensure authenticity and reliability. The intentional or negligent alteration of evidence is considered tampering, potentially rendering it inadmissible. The document emphasizes the importance of evidence integrity for a fair legal process, as consistently emphasized by Washington State courts. Commissioner Rugle’s involvement in providing a special form for evidence preservation is noted, emphasizing the need for proper handling of the video evidence. The document requests the court to immediately admit the video evidence, halt further action until the original evidence is properly preserved, maintain the video in its original quality, and consider reassignment of parties if necessary for justice administration. Overall, the document underscores the unethical conduct of altering evidence, judicial bias, and potential injustices faced by Aaron Surina in the custody dispute due to mishandling critical evidence. It also highlights the challenges and obstacles Aaron faces in seeking justice for himself and his children, urging the court to address these concerns for a fair and just resolution.
About The Author
