Document: ORDER QUASHING
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//627.0 ORDER QUASHING 2024-08-28 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-08-28
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this court document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias against him and his two sons. The order quashing the motion for relief appears to dismiss the father’s legitimate concerns without proper consideration. The court’s finding that there was no notice of the hearing and that the case was not properly served raises questions about due process and fairness.
The lack of explanation or justification for quashing the motion further suggests a lack of transparency and accountability on the part of the court. This decision may have deprived the father and his sons of their right to seek relief and protection from harm.
Overall, this document highlights potential injustices faced by the father and his sons in their pursuit of legal remedies. The lack of proper legal reasoning and apparent dismissal of their claims without adequate review raise serious concerns about the fairness and integrity of the judicial process in this case.
About The Author
