Document: AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//642.0 AFFIDAVIT OF DEFENDANT RESPONDENT 2024-09-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-09-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document presented by Aaron Surina, the father of DMS & AAS, sheds light on numerous instances of unfairness and unethical conduct in the legal proceedings concerning custody and protective orders in Spokane County, Washington. As an out-of-state resident, Aaron has encountered significant obstacles in fully engaging in the legal process and securing his due process rights. One major concern is the delayed receipt of a motion to quash the Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), leaving Aaron with inadequate time to respond before the hearing, thus impeding his ability to prepare adequately and present his case, thereby violating due process principles.
Moreover, there are allegations of procedural irregularities and limited access to essential documents and information. Representing himself as a pro-se litigant, Aaron has faced challenges in responding to modified court orders and presenting crucial video evidence supporting his case. The conduct of the opposing party’s attorney has hindered Aaron’s full participation in the proceedings and his ability to safeguard his children from potential harm.
Additionally, the document points to violations of the Spokane County Superior Court Local Rules (SCLCR), particularly concerning service, timelines, and procedural requirements for motions and emergency relief. The failure to adhere to these rules has further disadvantaged Aaron in advocating for his children’s safety and well-being.
The document also highlights the judge’s biased ruling against Aaron, denying his request for statutory relief and unjustly labeling him as a vexatious litigator, potentially damaging his reputation and obstructing his pursuit of justice for his children. The judge’s decision to restrict commissioner activity on the case may constitute a violation of due process, limiting court involvement and potentially impeding Aaron’s access to justice.
In sum, the document underscores a troubling pattern of unfair treatment, procedural lapses, and lack of due process for Aaron Surina in his quest to protect his children from potential harm. The allegations of judicial bias, unethical behavior, and injustices against Aaron and his sons raise significant concerns about the integrity of the legal proceedings and the preservation of their constitutional rights. Aaron’s plea for justice and fairness in the legal system appears to have been disregarded, necessitating a comprehensive review of the case to address these issues and uphold the rights of all parties involved, particularly favoring Aaron Surina and his children.
About The Author
