Document: PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//643.0 PROPOSED ORDER FINDINGS 2024-09-09 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-09-09
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, these court documents reflect a pattern of unfairness and unethical conduct that has worked against him and his efforts to protect his children. The initial Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) was reinstated, indicating a lack of consideration for the father’s rights and potentially biased decision-making. The order for proper service and notice highlights a failure to ensure adequate communication and opportunities for response, suggesting a disregard for due process.
Additionally, the order to admit video evidence appears to be a step in the right direction, but the retention of the evidence by the court until shortly before the hearing raises concerns about transparency and fairness in the proceedings. The directive for reviewing procedural irregularities acknowledges potential issues with access and communication, indicating a recognition of past failures in ensuring a fair process.
Overall, these documents suggest a lack of impartiality and fairness in the handling of the case, with potential biases and injustices working against the father’s attempts to protect his children. The father’s perspective would likely emphasize the need for a more transparent and equitable legal process that prioritizes the well-being and safety of the children involved.
About The Author
