Document: APPEARANCE PRO SE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//667.0 APPEARANCE PRO SE 2024-10-29 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2024-10-29
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document provided by Aaron Surina, the respondent father, exposes a series of unethical behaviors and biases that have plagued his legal proceedings. It outlines various instances where the petitioner, likely Sirinya Surina, has actively sought to impede Aaron’s access to legal representation by engaging with multiple attorneys, creating obstacles that hinder his ability to secure competent legal assistance. This calculated interference not only obstructs Aaron’s pursuit of justice but also places undue financial and emotional strains on him and his children.
Moreover, the document sheds light on the petitioner’s manipulative tactics, which have influenced a concerning shift in Aaron’s attorney’s approach, casting doubt on the validity of a restraining order. This shift appears to be a direct consequence of the petitioner’s underhanded maneuvers, indicating a lack of fairness in the legal proceedings.
Additionally, the petitioner’s deliberate hindrances, such as complicating the discovery process and delaying the custody trial scheduling, severely curtail Aaron’s capacity to safeguard his interests and those of his children. These actions create an unjust environment for Aaron and raise significant doubts about the impartiality of the proceedings.
Furthermore, the document underscores the opposing counsel’s efforts to restrict Aaron’s access to legal representation through procedural manipulations and contacting multiple attorneys, ultimately pushing Aaron towards self-representation. This interference not only compromises the fairness of the proceedings but also underscores a clear bias against Aaron.
In essence, Aaron’s document paints a picture of systemic unethical conduct, bias, and injustices that have marred his legal battle for custody and the protection of his children. The petitioner and opposing counsel’s deliberate actions have not only impeded Aaron’s access to justice and legal representation but have also created a fundamentally inequitable landscape within the legal proceedings. Aaron’s plea for recognition of his pro se representation and a fair outcome underscores the urgent need for the court to address the apparent injustices and ensure a level playing field for all parties involved, particularly in light of potential unethical conduct by the opposing counsel, including Stanley Kempner or Keith Glanzer.
About The Author
