Document: REPORT-STATUS
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//70.0 REPORT-STATUS 2017-11-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-11-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document provided outlines a Family Law Motion Status Report in the case of Sirinya Surina v. Aaron Surina. From the father’s perspective, there are several aspects of this document that raise concerns regarding unethical conduct, judicial bias, and potential injustices.
1. Unfair Treatment: The document indicates that the motion for contempt regarding parenting plan and residential issues was filed by the mother, Sirinya Surina, against Aaron Surina. This suggests a bias towards the mother as the initiator of legal actions, potentially indicating a predisposition in her favor.
2. Lack of Fair Resolution Attempts: The report states that the parties and attorneys attempted to resolve issues or settle motions but were unsuccessful. This could imply a lack of genuine effort towards finding a fair and just resolution, potentially favoring one party over the other.
3. Late Filed Declarations: The document mentions objections to late-filed declarations by the petitioner, Sirinya Surina. This could be seen as an attempt to manipulate the proceedings by not adhering to proper filing procedures, potentially disadvantaging Aaron Surina in presenting his case effectively.
4. Discrepancies in Document Filing: The document lists the declarations filed by both parties, showing a difference in the number of pages and timing of submissions. This raises concerns about unequal treatment in document review and consideration, which could impact the fairness of the decision-making process.
5. Attorney Representation: The presence of attorneys for both parties, Heather Hoover and Keith Glanzer, may suggest a disparity in legal representation and resources, potentially affecting the father’s ability to present his case adequately and defend his rights.
In summary, the Family Law Motion Status Report raises red flags regarding potential unethical conduct, judicial bias, and injustices that may be impacting Aaron Surina’s ability to protect his children and seek statutory relief. The document highlights a need for closer scrutiny of the legal proceedings to ensure fairness and impartiality in the resolution of the family law issues at hand.
About The Author
