Document: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//86.0 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 2018-01-08 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-08
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects potential unethical conduct and judicial bias. The Order to Show Cause appears to have been initiated by the Respondent, suggesting a bias against the Petitioner (the father, Aaron Surina) from the start. The language used in the document, such as the warning that the court may approve the other party’s requests without hearing the father’s side if he does not attend the hearing, indicates a lack of consideration for due process and fairness.
Furthermore, the document does not provide any details or specifics regarding the alleged contempt or the reasons behind the contempt hearing. This lack of transparency could be seen as an attempt to deny the father the opportunity to defend himself properly.
Additionally, the document does not mention any efforts to address the father’s concerns or protect his constitutional rights to due process and a fair trial. The lack of consideration for these fundamental rights raises concerns about the impartiality and fairness of the court proceedings.
Overall, this document reflects a potential violation of ethical conduct by not ensuring a fair and transparent process for the father, Aaron Surina, and suggests a bias against him in the court proceedings.
About The Author
