Document: TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER – AUTO
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//9.0 TEMP RESTRAINING ORDER – AUTO 2017-08-14 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2017-08-14
Summary (Justice Demanded)
The document in question is a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that imposes restrictions and requirements on both parties involved, particularly Aaron Surina, the father. From Aaron’s perspective, the TRO appears to exhibit signs of potential unfairness, unethical conduct, and judicial bias.
Several aspects of the document raise concerns for Aaron. Firstly, the restrictions placed on him, such as limited access to financial and household records and the prohibition on making negative comments about the other parent, could be viewed as overly restrictive and infringing on his rights. The threat of sanctions, including payment of attorney’s fees for non-compliance, may create an imbalance of power, especially if one party is more financially stable than the other, pressuring Aaron to comply even if he perceives the order as unjust.
Furthermore, requirements such as attending a co-parenting seminar and the potential appointment of a Guardian ad Litem (GAL) may be seen as burdensome and biased against Aaron. The effective date of the order, which immediately binds Aaron upon filing, also puts him at a disadvantage compared to the respondent.
Overall, Aaron may feel that the provisions of the TRO do not adequately consider his rights as a parent and suggest a lack of fairness and potential favoritism towards the other party. It is crucial for the court to ensure that both parties are treated equitably and that any orders issued are grounded in principles of justice and fairness, particularly in cases involving family law and child custody.
About The Author
