**Document**: NOTICE OF HEARING 1-23 8:30 202
**Link**: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/100.0 NOTICE OF HEARING 1-23 8:30 202 2018-01-12 .pdf)
**Filing Date**: 2018-01-12
### Summary (Father-Favorable)
The court document indicates that Aaron Surina has been given a notice of hearing for a motion brought forth by the petitioner, Sirinya Surina. This court notice may seem unfair or biased towards Aaron Surina for several reasons. Firstly, the document imposes a strict requirement on Aaron to respond to the motion/petition in writing at least four days before the hearing date. This may be seen as unjust, especially if Aaron wasn’t given sufficient time to prepare his response.
Moreover, the document stipulates that if Aaron fails to appear, the motion will be granted by default, which can be perceived as a bias against him. The document does not clarify the consequences of the petitioner not appearing for the hearing, potentially creating an imbalance.
Additionally, the court only allows ten minutes of argument from each side, which may not be adequate for Aaron to fully present his case. Also, oral testimonies are only permitted by prior court order, which may limit Aaron’s ability to provide a comprehensive defense.
Finally, the document’s requirement for a detailed financial declaration, in cases where financial relief is being sought, could potentially infringe on Aaron’s privacy rights. This could be viewed as an unfair burden placed on the respondent, further demonstrating potential bias in the court’s procedures.
About The Author
