Document: ORDER SHORTENING TIME
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l//115.0 ORDER SHORTENING TIME 2018-01-19 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-19
Summary (Justice Demanded)
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias in favor of the petitioner, Sirinya Surina. The court commissioner granted the petitioner’s motion for a contempt hearing without thoroughly considering the respondent’s side or giving him a fair opportunity to present his case. The document does not mention any efforts made to address the respondent’s concerns or provide him with adequate time to prepare for the hearing.
Furthermore, the court’s decision to schedule the hearing on short notice, just six days after the motion was filed, shows a lack of consideration for the respondent’s rights and ability to defend himself. This rushed timeline could potentially prevent the respondent from gathering evidence or securing legal representation, further stacking the odds against him in the upcoming hearing.
The document also highlights a lack of impartiality on the part of the court, as it appears to favor the petitioner’s requests without critically evaluating the circumstances or ensuring a fair process for both parties. The respondent, Aaron Surina, and his two sons have been fighting to protect themselves from harm and seek justice through the legal system, but the court’s actions in this case suggest a disregard for their rights and well-being.
In summary, this document showcases a troubling pattern of unfairness and bias against Aaron Surina and his children, indicating a need for a more just and equitable legal process to address their grievances and protect their rights.
About The Author
