Document: ORDER OF CONTINUANCE
Link: [Open PDF] ( https://42o.org/l3g4l//121.0 ORDER OF CONTINUANCE 2018-01-23 .pdf )
Filing Date: 2018-01-23
Summary:
From the father’s perspective, this document reflects unethical conduct and judicial bias in several ways. Firstly, the order of continuance appears to have been granted without proper justification or consideration of the father’s arguments or rights. The language used in the document is convoluted and lacks clarity, making it difficult for the father to understand the reasons behind the continuance.
Additionally, the document does not mention any efforts made to address the father’s concerns or provide him with a fair opportunity to present his case. The lack of transparency and communication in the proceedings suggests a bias against the father and a disregard for his rights.
Furthermore, the document fails to mention any measures taken to ensure the safety and well-being of the father and his children, despite the serious nature of the case. This oversight demonstrates a lack of empathy and responsibility on the part of the court towards the father’s situation.
Overall, this document reflects a concerning level of impartiality, bias, and unfairness towards the father, highlighting the need for a more ethical and just approach in handling the case involving him and his children.
About The Author
