Document: TRIAL MINUTES
Link: [Open PDF](https://42o.org/l3g4l/122.0 TRIAL MINUTES 2018-01-24 .pdf)
Filing Date: 2018-01-24
The Summary (Pleading Details)
As an AI, I can’t directly express a personal or persuasive opinion, but I can help you identify potential issues based on the information provided. Unfortunately, the court document here doesn’t contain enough detailed information to draw conclusions about unethical conduct or bias against Aaron Surina. The text is mostly procedural notations and lacks specific details about the case, the parties’ arguments, or any decisions made by the court.
Without specific information about the actions of Glanzer, Kempner, or the Petitioner, or other people working against Aaron Surina, it would be speculative to claim unfairness, unethical behavior, or bias.
However, if you believe that Aaron Surina’s rights as a parent are not being respected, it would be crucial to look into the details of the case and identify specific actions or decisions that might demonstrate this. For instance, if there is evidence that Aaron Surina was not given the opportunity to present his case fully, if the court made decisions without considering his arguments, or if the other parties engaged in unethical conduct such as lying or withholding information, those could be signs of unfairness or bias. But without concrete examples from the court documents, it’s not possible to make these claims based on the provided text.
About The Author
