In the case of In re the Marriage of Aaron Michael Surina, the Respondent, Aaron Surina, opposes the Petitioner’s motion for the immediate sale of their residence. Aaron asserts that the home is his sole and separate property, supported by a Quitclaim Deed signed by the Petitioner in 2015. He highlights that the issue of ownership should be resolved through mediation or trial, as the property is a potential income-producing asset that could benefit their children.
Aaron expresses concerns that selling the home before the trial scheduled for September 10, 2018, would deprive him of the opportunity to retain the property and pay the Petitioner her share determined at trial. He emphasizes the importance of preserving the asset for the benefit of all parties involved, especially their children.
The email reveals a clear attempt by the Petitioner to force the sale of the residence, disregarding Aaron’s rights and the potential financial benefits for their family. Aaron’s objections are legally sound, emphasizing the need for a fair resolution through mediation or trial.
This situation underscores the injustices that fathers like Aaron Surina face in family court proceedings. It highlights the importance of upholding fathers’ rights and ensuring fair treatment in legal matters concerning their children and assets. The attempt to rush the sale of the residence without proper consideration of Aaron’s rights and the children’s well-being is concerning and potentially harmful.
It is crucial to raise awareness about such cases and advocate for justice for fathers who are wronged in family court proceedings. The legal system should protect the rights of all parties involved and prioritize the best interests of the children. Aaron’s case serves as a reminder of the challenges fathers may encounter in family law cases and the importance of fighting for fairness and justice in such situations.
About The Author
